Several Strategies for Hair Removal

Hair is this kind of emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we would like we can’t have and what we have we don’t want! Frizzy hair and we would like straight, straight hair and we would like curly, brunette and we would like blonde, blonde and we would like red. Likewise upper lip hair on women, so valued as an indication of exquisite beauty in certain elements of the world, is vilified by our Western society.

Unwanted hair is really a common problem affecting nearly all women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the utilization of various temporary ways of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it is often combined with feelings of poor self-confidence, an expression of isolation and low self worth.

Because the instances when bearded women in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to remove any trace of hair from any and every part of these body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it is not merely women which can be now affected… increasingly the male gender is susceptible to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair may be just as vilified by the male population nowadays while the female.

Different Types of Hair Removal

Superfluous hair growth may be brought on by many factors, such as for instance, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the only permanent way of hair removal, is cure that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and recently, as a result of society’s attitudes, how many male clients is increasing.

To generally meet this need there as been many hair removal measures some of which return centuries in history. Hair removal has been around since caveman times but interestingly the elements of the body we’re removing hair from have differed on the ages. Removing hair from the top and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes however for survival. There is evidence that cavemen did this but in addition the ancient Egyptians and it absolutely was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the top would take away the main advantage of an adversary having anything to grab onto along with having less mites!

In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. In fact these women removed most of these body hair, with the exception of eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It had been also considered uncivilized for guys to have hair on their face. Undesired facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of an individual of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a questionnaire of razors manufactured from flint or bronze while the razor was not invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.

They also used a way of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) will be put on skin, a strip of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – very same of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There clearly was also another technique used called threading that is recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn will be placed through the fingers of both hands, and quickly stroked on the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. Through the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of these eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads to be able to give the look of an extended brow and forehead was fashionable. It is startling to notice the obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from ab muscles beginning.

Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are typical temporary methods that lots of people try today. In fact new hair removal devices seem to seem like buses – every 20 minutes or so! However, technology has moved on and with it, it appears there are some restricted and doubtful ways of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods have been in a restricted category since the former has been banned in some countries just like the USA and the latter are only in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are some of the doubtful methods in that there is no established data on their effectiveness.

Electrolysis continues to be the only proven permanent way of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited out of this tried and trusted treatment. It is the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a remarkable transformation inside their clients, from a timid, introverted personality at the start of a program of treatments, to a comfortable and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.

Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ in our Western society is a multiple million pound industry. This type of huge money making machine though will have significantly more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none of which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.

Hair Removal methods are both permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this in your mind there is only 1 system in the marketplace today that can totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because of its longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for many hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It continues to be utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting the hospital laser hair removal departments. It can be considered an essential tool in the job of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It gives cosmetic relief for the buyer with mild hirsute problems to the individual with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require several hours of treatment.

Apparently there’s been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the words ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached that when the hairs that have been removed don’t grow back for an amount of twelve months after the past treatment, permanent reduction may be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains even today, the one method legally allowed to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.

The newer technologies such as for instance LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for many permanent hair removal. This, it is now realised, is at best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The truth is that this was wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are far more realistic. The truth is that whilst they have their successes there is also their limitations – they can’t treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.

Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ but not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The truth is this newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it really simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair for this to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not most of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The remaining 5% – 15% hair is likely to be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but nonetheless stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the only option of ‘permanent hair removal’ right down to additional electrolysis treatment to perform the job. Laser and IPL are actually recognised to be always a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.

Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators use a burst of filtered light targeted at one hair at a time. Following the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light found in the device is targeted from the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. To enable this process, fibre-optic probes were inserted to the hair follicle through that your light was flashed. There is no clinical data published so far to aid any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.

The tweezer method having its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was initially patented in 1959. This technique functions passing an household current through the tweezers, which holds the hair at first glance of skin by grasping them for several minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations while the claim of electricity destroying the main of the hair doesn’t have scientific backup.

How to remove hair permanently from the face, legs, and body

Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published up to now to establish the declare that permanent hair removal is achievable using these methods. In 1985 when the utilization of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches in place of cotton swabs were introduced and a title change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the thought of direct current 永久脫毛 (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the utilization of a needle. A DC household current is passed by way of a conductive gel at first glance of skin via an adhesive patch placed on the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the household current that travels right down to the hair follicle.

Currently no clinical data can be acquired and the laws of physics don’t support the claims made by the manufacturers. Hair doesn’t conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it will spread along the surface of skin rather than passing through the hair. Therefore, just like the tweezer method, the argument that it will reach the main of the hair to destroy it doesn’t have scientific backup.

Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the act they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It is stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into skin prevents any side effects.

Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as ‘next generation of longterm hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it is ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in exactly the same follicle proving that this can be a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA has not given the outcomes up to now regarding a credit card applicatoin to promote in April 2010 of the newest device.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.